Jump to content


Tower snaps on Excalibur (Blackcomb Mtn)


  • You cannot reply to this topic
119 replies to this topic

#101 mr_quag

    New User

  • Member
  • 3 Posts:

Posted 23 December 2008 - 10:44 PM

View PostSkier, on Dec 23 2008, 09:48 PM, said:

The force of the ice expansion and the subsequent rupture has been estimated at 800 tonnes of pressure.


Why does W-B keep quoting this? Tonnes isn't really a unit of pressure - it's a unit of force.

Not a big deal, but it does bug me slightly.

jeff

#102 Aussierob

    Lift Sparky

  • Industry II
  • 1,036 Posts:
  • Interests:Search and Rescue
    Hockey
    Ski Touring
    Geocaching

Posted 24 December 2008 - 05:04 AM

Excalibur will open today. :smile:

http://www.whistlerblackcomb.com/media/new...09/081223_2.htm
Rob
Ray's Rule for Precision - Measure with a micrometer, mark with chalk, cut with an axe.

#103 2milehi

    Established User

  • Industry II
  • 1,035 Posts:
  • Interests:Makin' sparks, breakin' part

Posted 24 December 2008 - 09:55 AM

View PostAussierob, on Dec 24 2008, 06:04 AM, said:


STRONG WORK to all lift maintenance at W-B!
Anything is possible when you don't understand what you are talking about.

#104 vonrollskyway1

    Established User

  • Member
  • 104 Posts:
  • Interests:vonroll type 101s.from sidechairs to skyrides.i manufacture model vr 101s as a hobby/buisness http://groups.yahoo.com/group/disneylandskyway/

Posted 24 December 2008 - 10:23 AM

View Post2milehi, on Dec 24 2008, 09:55 AM, said:

STRONG WORK to all lift maintenance at W-B!
i half to agree.great work guys at w-b!!! :smile:
the 1st and still the best.......VonRoll ltd Berne Switzerland!VonRoll Type 101.1945 to 1977.a true lift,a original lift,a pioneer.relive the past...vonroll type 101!http://groups.yahoo.com/group/disneylandskyway/

#105 lastchair_44

    Established User

  • Administrator II
  • 1,159 Posts:

Posted 24 December 2008 - 10:37 AM

Indeed, nice work guys!
-Jimmi

#106 Emax

    Established User

  • Industry II
  • 2,904 Posts:

Posted 24 December 2008 - 12:41 PM

View Postmr_quag, on Dec 23 2008, 11:44 PM, said:

Why does W-B keep quoting this? Tonnes isn't really a unit of pressure - it's a unit of force.

Not a big deal, but it does bug me slightly.

jeff


How true. You'd think the Canucks would get this right.

1 tonne = 1000 kg = 2,204.6 lb

1psi = 6894.757 Pascal (newton/square meter)
There are three roads to ruin; women, gambling and technicians. The most pleasant is with women, the quickest is with gambling, but the surest is with technicians. Georges Pompidou

#107 Aussierob

    Lift Sparky

  • Industry II
  • 1,036 Posts:
  • Interests:Search and Rescue
    Hockey
    Ski Touring
    Geocaching

Posted 24 December 2008 - 01:33 PM

So if we want to be really pedantic, tonnes are actually a unit of mass, not force or pressure. Tonnes are frequently used because people can visualise the concept much more easily.

800t x 1000 x 9.81 = 7848 kN of force was applied to the connection plate. The diameter of the tower tube is 766 mm = .766m

Therefore pi x .383 x .383 = .4608 square metres and P= f/a = 7848000/.4608 = 17031250 Pascals of pressure or 17031250/6894.797 = 2470psi

Now my brain hurts. :wacko2:
Rob
Ray's Rule for Precision - Measure with a micrometer, mark with chalk, cut with an axe.

#108 TRosenbaum

    Established User

  • Industry II
  • 49 Posts:

Posted 24 December 2008 - 09:54 PM

The damaged part of the Excalibur gondola that was temporarily closed for repairs did indeed open today 12/24/2008. I had an uneventful ride up the reopened lift this afternoon.

#109 mr_quag

    New User

  • Member
  • 3 Posts:

Posted 25 December 2008 - 10:46 PM

View PostAussierob, on Dec 24 2008, 01:33 PM, said:

So if we want to be really pedantic, tonnes are actually a unit of mass, not force or pressure.


OOPS! That's really embarrassing on my part. I sometimes forget that tons are a unit of force but tonnes are a unit of mass.

Jeff

#110 aug

    Lift Maint. Manager

  • Industry II
  • 745 Posts:
  • Interests:Flatlander heckling

Posted 26 December 2008 - 05:46 AM

View Postmr_quag, on Dec 25 2008, 10:46 PM, said:

OOPS! That's really embarrassing on my part. I sometimes forget that tons are a unit of force but tonnes are a unit of mass.

Jeff

oops again.... ton(sae) or tonne (metric ton) are units of WEIGHT.
"Maybe there is no Heaven. Or maybe this is all pure gibberish—a product of the demented imagination of a lazy drunken hillbilly with a heart full of hate who has found a way to live out where the real winds blow—to sleep late, have fun, get wild, drink whisky, and drive fast on empty streets with nothing in mind except falling in love and not getting arrested . . . Res ipsa loquitur (it speaks for it self). Let the good times roll." HT

#111 Aussierob

    Lift Sparky

  • Industry II
  • 1,036 Posts:
  • Interests:Search and Rescue
    Hockey
    Ski Touring
    Geocaching

Posted 28 December 2008 - 06:49 PM

Okay,
I stand corrected. Tonnes are units of weight, but essentially the same as mass in a fixed gravity envrionment. http://en.wikipedia....s_versus_weight
Rob
Ray's Rule for Precision - Measure with a micrometer, mark with chalk, cut with an axe.

#112 2milehi

    Established User

  • Industry II
  • 1,035 Posts:
  • Interests:Makin' sparks, breakin' part

Posted 28 December 2008 - 10:24 PM

View PostAussierob, on Dec 28 2008, 07:49 PM, said:

Okay,
I stand corrected. Tonnes are units of weight, but essentially the same as mass in a fixed gravity envrionment. http://en.wikipedia....s_versus_weight

If a tonne is equal to 1000 kg, then a tonne is a measurement of mass.
Anything is possible when you don't understand what you are talking about.

#113 aug

    Lift Maint. Manager

  • Industry II
  • 745 Posts:
  • Interests:Flatlander heckling

Posted 29 December 2008 - 07:10 AM

Mass and Weight
The mass of an object is a fundamental property of the object; a numerical measure of its inertia; a fundamental measure of the amount of matter in the object. Definitions of mass often seem circular because it is such a fundamental quantity that it is hard to define in terms of something else. All mechanical quantities can be defined in terms of mass, length, and time. The usual symbol for mass is m and its SI unit is the kilogram. While the mass is normally considered to be an unchanging property of an object, at speeds approaching the speed of light one must consider the increase in the relativistic mass.

The weight of an object is the force of gravity on the object and may be defined as the mass times the acceleration of gravity, w = mg. Since the weight is a force, its SI unit is the newton. Density is mass/volume.

for example ...If an object has 1 kg. of mass on the earth, it would have a mass of 1kg on the moon even though it would weigh 1/6 as much.
So since we are trying to figure out how much force was applied to the inside of the tower tube. Newtons would be the Ideal unit of measurement.


Now that we are way :offtopic: Great job W-B for getting your lift back in service during the x-mas season.

This post has been edited by aug: 29 December 2008 - 07:40 AM

"Maybe there is no Heaven. Or maybe this is all pure gibberish—a product of the demented imagination of a lazy drunken hillbilly with a heart full of hate who has found a way to live out where the real winds blow—to sleep late, have fun, get wild, drink whisky, and drive fast on empty streets with nothing in mind except falling in love and not getting arrested . . . Res ipsa loquitur (it speaks for it self). Let the good times roll." HT

#114 Aussierob

    Lift Sparky

  • Industry II
  • 1,036 Posts:
  • Interests:Search and Rescue
    Hockey
    Ski Touring
    Geocaching

Posted 29 December 2008 - 07:32 AM

Yeah, the boys did a pretty awesome job. I wasn't involved, but a number of guys piled on the OT to get the job done.
Rob
Ray's Rule for Precision - Measure with a micrometer, mark with chalk, cut with an axe.

#115 2milehi

    Established User

  • Industry II
  • 1,035 Posts:
  • Interests:Makin' sparks, breakin' part

Posted 02 January 2009 - 08:07 AM

Aussierob - was it determined how so much water entered a sealed tower tube?
Anything is possible when you don't understand what you are talking about.

#116 Aussierob

    Lift Sparky

  • Industry II
  • 1,036 Posts:
  • Interests:Search and Rescue
    Hockey
    Ski Touring
    Geocaching

Posted 05 January 2009 - 11:30 AM

I haven't heard the official cause yet.
Rob
Ray's Rule for Precision - Measure with a micrometer, mark with chalk, cut with an axe.

#117 ski89

    Weekend warriors.....

  • Industry II
  • 215 Posts:
  • Interests:Puttering around the Ski area.

Posted 05 January 2009 - 02:19 PM

I believe the lower section of the tower was filled with concrete and the water was above that. The freezing water had initially affected the alignment of the assemblies and adjustments were made immediatetly prior to the failure without realizing the cause. I'm, going to drill holes in the bottom of mine and inspect annually. I'll put a rubber stopper in it also.
Up and running...

#118 brad82

    Established User

  • Member
  • 71 Posts:

Posted 06 January 2009 - 01:01 PM

View Postski89, on Jan 5 2009, 03:19 PM, said:

I believe the lower section of the tower was filled with concrete and the water was above that. The freezing water had initially affected the alignment of the assemblies and adjustments were made immediatetly prior to the failure without realizing the cause. I'm, going to drill holes in the bottom of mine and inspect annually. I'll put a rubber stopper in it also.


Could that not damage the towers structural integrity and make it more prone to rusting ?


And just a general question : When the lift is handed over by the building crew, are the maintenace teams not told which towers contain concrete ?

This post has been edited by brad82: 06 January 2009 - 01:02 PM


#119 Andoman

    Established User

  • Member
  • 395 Posts:
  • Interests:Winning the lotto

Posted 06 January 2009 - 02:43 PM

View Postbrad82, on Jan 6 2009, 05:01 PM, said:

Could that not damage the towers structural integrity and make it more prone to rusting ?


And just a general question : When the lift is handed over by the building crew, are the maintenace teams not told which towers contain concrete ?


with older concrete mixes this would have been a issue, but with newer mixes and new concrete additives this shouldn't be as much of a problem. They could also coat the inside of the pole with epoxy to stop the contact between the metal and concrete if they really wanted to.

#120 Aussierob

    Lift Sparky

  • Industry II
  • 1,036 Posts:
  • Interests:Search and Rescue
    Hockey
    Ski Touring
    Geocaching

Posted 06 January 2009 - 05:50 PM

View Postbrad82, on Jan 6 2009, 01:01 PM, said:

Could that not damage the towers structural integrity and make it more prone to rusting ?


And just a general question : When the lift is handed over by the building crew, are the maintenace teams not told which towers contain concrete ?


Yes, Thats why towers don't usually have a hole in them in the first place.

I guess they would, but you will find out pretty quickly which towers have concrete during summer maintenance.
Rob
Ray's Rule for Precision - Measure with a micrometer, mark with chalk, cut with an axe.





6 User(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 6 guests, 0 anonymous users