Which is better?
What are some of the reasons to go with a vualt drive vs a overhead drive?
Is a vualt drive easier to work on then a overhead drive?


Vault Drive Vs. Overhead Drive
Started by Kicking Horse, Apr 05 2005 03:16 PM
7 replies to this topic
#2
Posted 05 April 2005 - 03:34 PM
from what I understand (correct me please if i'm wrong), vault drives (on doubles) are all pre - 1970's, from before there were overhead drives. I am pretty sure that overhead drives weren't even invented yet. Some early HSQ's (ie. Flyer @ Copper) are vaults. (John correct me,) But I believe that this was done by Pomalgski of France, and because the: very large drive for a 9900' quad, and all of the necessary parts for the detaching and candencing would not be able to fit into an overhead terminal.
I am sure that there are more reasons. But basically, vault drives are not really built anymore. there is another thread somewhere about this topic.
I am sure that there are more reasons. But basically, vault drives are not really built anymore. there is another thread somewhere about this topic.
Alex Durant
UMFC 71/81
Skiing could be the greatest sport ever... besides girls. There both up there.
UMFC 71/81
Skiing could be the greatest sport ever... besides girls. There both up there.
#6
Posted 05 April 2005 - 04:52 PM
Could it be that they have vault drives for larger engines that can't fit in the top? Would it just be easier to work on the drive in that room? Also, is it somewhat inconvenient for the drive to be in the room and the terminal is inaccesable directly from the room?
My life or my chocolate: Give me a minute, I'm thinking.
Isn't it odd that "politics" is made up of the word "poli" meaning many, and "tics" meaning blood-sucking creatures?
Isn't it odd that "politics" is made up of the word "poli" meaning many, and "tics" meaning blood-sucking creatures?
#7
Posted 05 April 2005 - 06:44 PM
Everything has its good and bad points. Vaults have more room for the drive and drive accessories i.e. gearbox coolers. The terminal on a vault-drive detachable is also more spacious because there is no motor, gearbox, aux, et cetera. The disadvantage to a vault is that when you're doing certain maintenance items, you end up going up and down more than you'd like. My e-brakes come to mind since the pump and fluid reservior is in the vault and the brakes are on the bullwheel. There is also much more construction time involved, and you need a certain topography to avoid simply digging a pit and installing stairs. I worked in four vault-drive doubles at Baker and it was actually pretty nice since the buildings were built with plenty of room. We actually used one (old chair 4) as an ancillary parts house. That said, overhead drives are nice because everything is in one place and there's no long, heavy drive shaft to worry about.
Member, Department of Ancient Technology, Colorado chapter.
2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users